fbpx

Enter the Wyoming Outdoor Council Photo Contest!

Submit your best Wyoming Photos for inclusion in the Wyoming Outdoor Council’s 2013 calendar.



Send us your best shots!

Submission deadline is September 17, 2012

DO YOU HAVE GREAT SHOTS OF WYOMING’S spectacular landscapes, wildlife, and people enjoying the great outdoors? If so, get them published in the Wyoming Outdoor Council’s annual calendar.

Previous calendars have included photographs by some of Wyoming’s best professional photographers, as well as some of its most gifted amateur shooters.

Contest Rules

  • Photographs must be taken in Wyoming and can include landscapes, lifestyles, wildlife, and people.
  • All photos must be submitted in digital form by email or online file sharing tool, mailed on a CD or DVD, or hand delivered on a CD, DVD, or flash drive.
  • Photos can only be published if available in a high-quality, relatively high-resolution, digital format.
  • Photograph entries constitute permission to use the images with credit to the photographer without monetary compensation.
  • Please include your name, address, city, state, zip code, daytime phone number, email address, and description of your photo including where the photo was taken.

 

TO SUBMIT PHOTOS, PLEASE EMAIL OR MAIL TO CHRIS MERRILL:

chris@wyomingoutdoorcouncil.org

Wyoming Outdoor Council
262 Lincoln Street
Lander, WY 82520

 

The photos above all appeared in previous Wyoming Outdoor Council calendars. Photo credits, from left to right and top to bottom are: Scott Copeland Images, Charles Stirum, Greg Aitkenhead, Chris Merrill, Scott Copeland Images, Julena Campbell, Scott Copeland Images, Robin Vicchy, and Lisa McGee. Background image: Scott Copeland Images.

Spring Frontline 2012, the Wyoming Outdoor Council Newsletter

The Wyoming Outdoor Council is encouraged that Wyoming’s leaders seem ready to have the conversation about baseline water testing.

“We believe that when legislators, regulators, and decision makers have had a chance to consider the facts and to hear the arguments for and against required baseline water testing in Wyoming, they’ll conclude, as we have, that it makes sense,” said Steve Jones, the Council’s watershed protection program attorney. “It’s a matter of public health and public trust and it’s the best path forward.”

Click here or on the image of the newsletter to read the Wyoming Outdoor Council’s spring 2012 Frontline.

 

 

Other posts you might want to see:

Why We’re Seeking Fracking Chemical Information

Groups seek better disclosure of fracking chemicals in Wyoming

Lummis, Barrasso respond to EPA investigation

EPA’s Presentation to the Pavillion Community Nov. 2011

EPA’s November 2011 Report on Pavillion Water Contamination

Hydraulic fracturing: what we’d like to achieve

UW hydraulic fracturing forum benefited from public involvement

NYT: Fracking has contaminated drinking water

NPR: Worries over water as fracking becomes pervasive

Why We’re Seeking Fracking Chemical Information

By Steve Jones

Disclosure is in the public interest

 

THE WYOMING OUTDOOR COUNCIL, ALONG WITH THE POWDER RIVER BASIN RESOURCE COUNCIL, Earthworks, and the watchdog group OMB Watch, filed suit on Friday, asking a court to require Wyoming to disclose information about chemicals used during the oil and gas development process known as hydraulic fracturing, or fracking.

This is part of an effort to help protect the public from exposure to toxic chemicals.

The nonprofit environmental law firm Earthjustice filed the petition on behalf of our coalition.

I want to emphasize that this is not an academic exercise for us.

In Wyoming, 98 percent of all new oil and gas drilling involves hydraulic fracturing. This means that all over the state, the oil and gas industry is conducting drilling operations that could affect groundwater, which is—or could be—put to beneficial use for livestock, domestic water wells, irrigation and other uses.

Groundwater is not the property of industry. Rather, it is the property of the people of Wyoming, and while water rights can be granted for groundwater, we all have an interest in ensuring that it is protected and kept clean and pure for future generations.

We have found that many companies are claiming trade secret status for their operations using boiler-plate language for all of their claims, without providing specific reasons why each chemical or set of chemicals is entitled to trade secret status.

Nevertheless, the Wyoming Oil and Gas Conservation Commission is approving these petitions right along with claims that are much more specific and detailed.

By our last count, there were 52 claims for trade secret status with regard to the fracking chemical disclosure requirement, and only 2 claims were denied. All the rest were approved by the WOGCC.

In our view, this is abusing the process. Trade secret status should be, as Oil and Gas Commission Supervisor Tom Doll has said, “the exception and not the rule.”

But in practice it is not turning out that way. That is why we are bringing this lawsuit.

We do not believe that trade secret status is justified in most cases, including the ones we are challenging in this lawsuit, and we believe that the State District Court in Natrona County will agree with us.

 

Background (from our coalition’s media release that was circulated Monday):

Under regulations approved in 2010, Wyoming became the first state in the nation to require well operators to disclose the identities of chemicals that are mixed with water and injected into the ground during fracking.

But since the regulations were adopted, the Commission has approved some 50 chemical secrecy requests by Halliburton and other oil and gas service companies.

“As a landowner facing deep oil and gas development, I need to know what chemicals are being injected underground so I can protect my water and land,” said Cheyenne resident and Powder River Basin Resource Council member Marilyn Ham.

Disclosure of hydraulic fracturing chemical information is a critical step in protecting public health and water quality. A review of the information that is already available is sobering: 78 percent of known fracking chemicals are associated with serious short-term health effects such as burning eyes, rashes, asthma-like effects, nausea, vomiting, headaches, dizziness, tremors, and convulsions. Between 22 and 47 percent of those chemicals also are associated with longer-term health effects, including cancer, organ damage, and harm to the endocrine system.

“Without knowing more about the chemicals used during fracking, it’s nearly impossible for residents to determine whether their drinking water has been contaminated by oil and gas development,” said Earthjustice Attorney Laura Beaton. “The more information we have, the easier it will be to keep people safe and healthy.”

Last November, our coalition of groups submitted a public records request to WOGCC, requesting a complete list of fracking chemicals that had not already been publicly disclosed.

The WOGCC withheld the names of chemicals, saying that drilling companies claimed they were exempt from reporting requirements under trade secret laws.

But a review of agency files found that WOGCC approved industry trade secret claims that were insufficiently justified and overly broad.

“We appreciate Wyoming’s leadership role in getting companies to disclose hydraulic fracturing chemical information,” said Shannon Anderson with the Powder River Basin Resource Council. “But like all new rules, it’s time we took a look at how it’s working. We found a lot of the information is being improperly labeled a trade secret, which means it is not public information as the regulation intended.”

The case now before Wyoming’s Seventh District Court could set a broad legal precedent–as the states of Texas, Arkansas, Pennsylvania, Colorado, Montana, and Michigan all have fracking chemical disclosure regulations similar to Wyoming’s on the books.

“As additional states, such as Oklahoma and Ohio, and the federal government, and even some European countries, begin work on their chemical disclosure regulations, it is more important than ever to make sure that the trade secret exemption is not used improperly,” said Earthworks’ Senior Staff Attorney Bruce Baizel.  “Unfortunately, our initial review of exemption requests showed that some companies appear to be taking advantage of the minimal state review.”

“The public needs to have complete access to information about hydraulic fracturing chemicals used by drillers,” said Steve Jones, Watershed Protection Program Attorney for Wyoming Outdoor Council. “In Wyoming, groundwater belongs to the public, and it can be contaminated by hydraulic fracturing operations, as studies across the country are beginning to show.  Trade secret claims should not be used to obstruct the public’s right to know what is going on beneath the surface with its groundwater.”

“People in Wyoming and throughout the country have a right to know what chemicals are being injected in the ground around their homes,” said Katherine McFate, president of OMB Watch.  “Citizens need complete information to assess the risks of allowing this kind of industrial activity near their homes and ranches and fresh water supplies. Without accurate information about the full range of chemicals used in hydraulic fracturing, neither public officials nor citizens will be able to make informed choices.”

For a link to the petition visit: http://earthjustice.org/documents/legal-document/pdf/wogcc-petition

 

 

Other posts you might want to see:

Groups seek better disclosure of fracking chemicals in Wyoming

Lummis, Barrasso respond to EPA investigation

EPA’s Presentation to the Pavillion Community Nov. 2011

EPA’s November 2011 Report on Pavillion Water Contamination

Hydraulic fracturing: what we’d like to achieve

UW hydraulic fracturing forum benefited from public involvement

NYT: Fracking has contaminated drinking water

NPR: Worries over water as fracking becomes pervasive

Fracking linked to water contamination

Fracking not as safe as industry claims

‘I asked them for the data and they wouldn’t share it’

 

 

Groups seek better disclosure of fracking chemicals in Wyoming

You can read the entire article at Reuters here.

 

 

Excerpt:

By Laura Zuckerman

SALMON, Idaho, March 26 (Reuters) – Environmental groups are asking a state court to force Wyoming to provide a more complete list of chemicals used in hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, a drilling technique vital to natural gas and oil production in the state.

Wyoming in 2010 became the first state to require disclosure of chemicals that energy companies inject – along with sand and water – deep underground to free gas or oil from rock. But the state exempted products and chemicals that qualified as confidential commercial information, or trade secrets.

The Wyoming Outdoor Council and others contend in a legal petition in state court that the Wyoming Oil and Gas Conservation Commission has illegally allowed energy drillers to claim exemptions where they were not warranted.

The groups claim such secrecy is impeding efforts to protect public health and water quality.

“There are 150 chemicals in Wyoming that these companies have asked to be protected under trade secret status,” said Steve Jones, watershed program protection attorney for the Wyoming Outdoor Council.

“Since these chemicals pose a potential threat to ground water and to people’s heath, we need to know what they are.”

Read the entire article here.

 

 

Other posts you might want to see:

Lummis, Barrasso respond to EPA investigation

EPA’s Presentation to the Pavillion Community Nov. 2011

EPA’s November 2011 Report on Pavillion Water Contamination

Hydraulic fracturing: what we’d like to achieve

UW hydraulic fracturing forum benefited from public involvement

NYT: Fracking has contaminated drinking water

NPR: Worries over water as fracking becomes pervasive

Fracking linked to water contamination

Fracking not as safe as industry claims

‘I asked them for the data and they wouldn’t share it’

 

 

Wyoming State Legislative wrap-up

By Richard Garrett, Jr.

Your voice for conservation at the Wyoming State Legislature

Signs of spring, even indoors

While others may have been looking outdoors for signs of spring, those of us who have been largely confined (at least during daylight hours) to the state’s capitol building for the last four weeks in Cheyenne have had to look elsewhere.

This year, the familiar indicators were all there and in abundance.

Some of the signs include senators and representatives nervously stalking the lobbies of their opposite chambers to see how their bills were faring; press releases from the governor’s office scheduling bill signings; and the depletion of snacks at the lobbyist’s Capitol Club.

Yes, spring arrived in Cheyenne, even indoors. Here are some of the highlights of the season.

Senate File 85, General Permits

This bill, hastily sponsored by the joint interim Minerals, Business, and Economic Development committee just two days before the session began, represents what we regard as an environmental rollback.

The bill was authored in response to the Wyoming Outdoor Council’s successful suit against the state and its Department of Environmental Quality for the manner in which the agency had issued general, watershed-wide permits for water produced from coalbed methane development.

This is a bad bill only made marginally better because the Outdoor Council, its members, and colleagues in the environmental community worked throughout the session for the inclusion of an amendment that guarantees the public’s right to comment on the authorization of permits for 30 days after their issuance and another amendment, written by the Outdoor Council’s Steve Jones, which better defines exactly what a permit is.

This bill definitely circumscribes the intent of the court and our only solace, other than the amendments, is that almost to a person, legislators have expressed solid support for revisiting the law during the interim.

The Joint Management Council has tasked the joint Minerals committee to do just that and Senate President Jim Anderson has indicated his support for this review as well.

Senate File 86, Greenhouse Gas Air Quality Regulation

The Wyoming Outdoor Council not only supported this bill during the session but also was a consistent and early voice in advocating its consideration.

In September 2010 we heard an executive with the parent company of Rocky Mountain Power carefully suggest to a legislative interim committee that the state might consider the development of a greenhouse gas permitting process.

Seizing on this opportunity the Outdoor Council engaged with various stakeholders over the course of the next 18 months and urged that the topic be discussed during the 2010 interim meetings.

With the passage of this bill, the state has for the first time in recent memory linked greenhouse gases to regulation—a rather remarkable feat.

As is often the case, a great deal of work remains to be accomplished. The state’s regulation will be no more stringent than the federal government’s (this is language that allows the state to maintain its primacy, something that is always paramount on the minds of legislators). In turn, we argue that the state should take a more forward-looking approach and if only by the smallest of increments regulate greenhouse gases more closely than the federal government will.

We see this approach as offering the state a real chance to differentiate itself in a way that could prove to have important competitive advantages.

Wyoming could be viewed as among the healthiest of states, one where clean air is valued as highly as open space, clean water resources, and natural resource development.

I exchanged email messages with a Wyoming Outdoor Council member from Pinedale during the consideration of Senate File 86. Here is what that member wrote (it is a message that I shared during committee debates on the bill):

“If Wyoming is going to get out and stay out of the (National Ambient Air Quality Standards) non-attainment hassle, it is important that Wyoming DEQ keep our air at least one notch cleaner than federal requirements … so that as federal regulations become more stringent, Wyoming can remain problem-free (no EPA involvement, no State bureaucratic waste spent on non-attainment, no significant hassle factor which might deter new development!).”

It is this kind of encouragement and perspective that the state must have—I am grateful that our members are alert and informed.

Letting legislators know of this involvement (by 1,500+ members) is vital to our mission.

Senate File 42, Large Project Funding (Wildlife and Natural Resource Trust Fund)

Since it was first created, Wyoming’s Wildlife and Natural Resource Trust has helped conserve natural habitat and is rightfully seen as one of the Wyoming Legislature’s signature achievements.

This year the trust (and Governor Mead) asked for support from the Legislature for 13 conservation easements. The Outdoor Council was personally asked by the governor for our support on this bill, a role we were glad to play during the session.

In fact the governor was following through on a pledge that he made last year after the Legislature removed the authority of the Environmental Quality Council to designate areas as Very Rare or Uncommon. The governor said then that he wanted to find other ways to recognize areas of the state as rare or uncommon, saying that he views conservation easements as one example of how the state, by leveraging its resources for dimes on the dollar with federal programs, can do just that.

The success of the “Large Project Funding” bill this year was never certain, particularly since so many in the Legislature oppose conservation easements. It is fair to say that the Wyoming Outdoor Council was an important role player in helping to make sure this legislation passed.

Senate File 41, Wolf Management

This bill came as a result of the announcement of an agreement between Governor Mead and the Department of the Interior to work toward securing a delisting of the wolf in Wyoming. The Outdoor Council has long advocated statewide trophy game management for the wolf, carried out by the Wyoming Game and Fish Department.

Sadly, that is not a position that has proven politically achievable. The compromise between the governor and the Interior Department means that the wolf will have a dual classification status, one that is further compromised by a ‘flex-line’ in Teton County that will be adjusted on a seasonal basis.

We are glad to note, however, that even with the signing of the bill there remains some thought that this dual status designation might ultimately, and with continued diligence, result in a single statewide trophy game status for the animal. Be assured that we will continue to monitor developments and keep our members informed.

Senate File 14, Nuclear and Hybrid Energy System Related Projects

Wyoming has long been one of the nation’s leaders in the production of uranium—a role that the state is likely to continue to promote given the reserves available.

The state’s enthusiasm for nuclear development must be tempered against the prospects for waste storage, costs of development, environmental consequences, and system failures.

It is against this backdrop that the University of Wyoming School of Energy Resources and the Idaho National Laboratories will enter into a partnership to take the very first steps toward better understanding exactly what path forward, if any, hybrid energy systems might have in the state.

While many are rightfully concerned about the problems posed by nuclear energy, it is crucial that the Outdoor Council be engaged in a constructive way in the discussion because if we are not we risk becoming marginalized.

The Idaho National Laboratories’ lead scientist on the project is Dr. Richard Boardman. The INL will contribute funding equal to Wyoming’s commitment of $250,000 for the study.

It is Dr. Boardman’s vision that small-scale, fail-safe next-generation and/or hybrid systems are a crucial way to achieve significant reductions in the production of anthropogenic greenhouse gases.

The study is sure to test that vision.

Senate File 71, Aquatic Invasive Species

This bill (and its predecessors) won strong support from the Legislature and is one that we supported as well. The challenges posed to the state’s recreation, tourism, and agricultural industries by invasive species (zebra and quagga mussels in particular) cannot be ignored.

Because Wyoming has taken a proactive position, the state is, thus far, believed to be free of these invasive predators. It seems crucial to the Outdoor Council that we support the state in all that it can do to avoid the consequences of the compromises to our surface water that the invasive species represent.

Senate File 77, Expenditure of public funds and government competition

While this was kind of a dark horse bill to follow (even though its sponsor, Senator Cale Case of Lander, is a long time supporter of many of our key issues) we found some justification to support it, primarily because it will task the Wyoming Department of Administration and Information with expanding its public website to include input from… the public.

While this website is primarily intended to field concerns from the general public about government competition with the private sector, we view it as an opportunity to learn in yet another way some of the problems that government might try to “solve” in its effort to get out of the way of private industry.

We will be sure to monitor this website and hope that you will, too.

House Bill 47, Omnibus Water Bill construction

This bill includes $750,000 in funding for a domestic water supply for rural residents of Pavillion, where some residents’ water wells have been contaminated, possibly as a result of gas drilling operations in the area.

This bill acknowledges the degradation of the groundwater resource and the responsibility of the state to be proactive in offering affected citizens access to clean water, reliably and affordably delivered.

This is a principle that the Outdoor Council has advocated and a challenge that Governor Mead embraced.

This bill serves as one small step forward in a complicated process that will, we hope, ultimately reveal the reasons that groundwater in rural Pavillion has been contaminated.

The governor and EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson have recently agreed to a more cooperative and collaborative engagement in the scientific process regarding study, peer review, and analysis of the rural Pavillion groundwater issue.

All of these, and other bills, can be found at the Wyoming State Legislature’s website; the legislature’s joint interim topic list can be found here.

As even the most casual follower of the Legislature knows, it’s not just a seasonal phenomenon but a year-long traveling road show.

The Wyoming Outdoor Council will be there every step of the way.

 

For more information, please don’t hesitate to be in touch with our Energy and Legislative Advocate, Richard Garrett. He can be reached, indoors or out, at richard@wyomingoutdoorcouncil.org or 307-438-9516

 

Other posts you might want to see:

Final week: the Legislature has important work to do

Another nail in the coffin for the flaming gorge pipeline?

In a short budget session, still some environment-related bills

Support the tax incentive for small renewable energy

Wyoming Looks to Craft a State Energy Policy: What to Consider

 

 

Final Week: The Legislature Has Important Work to Do

By Richard Garrett, Jr.

Your voice for conservation at the Wyoming State Legislature

Permits, wildlife, and invasive species

Today, March 5, marks the beginning of the last week of Wyoming’s 2012 legislative session and there are still important bills under consideration and issues to resolve.

It’s going to be a very eventful week in the legislature. The action will be fast and the way bills are amended, or not amended, will make crucial differences to how we work on the issues in this state.

Still trying to improve the general permitting bill

One bill that we’ve been following (since its hasty creation two days before the session began) is Senate File 85, “General permits.”

As introduced, it would have dismantled a victory that the Wyoming Outdoor Council won in district court last year regarding the way the state’s Department of Environmental Quality issues water discharge permits for coalbed methane development.

The Outdoor Council’s watershed protection program attorney, Steve Jones, argued successfully that the DEQ’s one-size-fits-all approach to produced water permits in coalbed methane fields of the Powder River Basin was not only bad for the environment but also legally flawed.

This bill would have done an end-run around the judicial process by allowing the Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality to resume its “business as usual” and “streamlined” approach to the issuance of general permits for a variety of activities including produced water from coalbed methane projects, storm water discharge, gravel pits, and a possible slew of new developments including in-situ uranium processing, underground coal refining, and landfills.

Public input on locally specific discharges would have been severely restricted.

The bill was amended in the Senate in a way that restored the opportunity of the public to comment on the authorization of permits (special thanks are due to Sen. John Schiffer for this amendment).

Unfortunately, this amendment has been eliminated in the House and many of the problems of the original bill have been magnified with a substitute amendment.

The Wyoming Outdoor Council is working with our colleagues in the conservation community to remove this amendment and to restore the Schiffer amendment.

If we are unable to find sufficient support for this, we will ask representatives and senators to vote against the bill.

Urging strong support for Wildlife and Natural Resource Trust bill

A bill that we are actively supporting is Senate File 42, which would provide funding for large projects that have been approved by Wyoming’s Wildlife and Natural Resource Trust. Gov. Matt Mead and a broad coalition of legislators also support this bill.

The Wyoming State Legislature is rightfully proud of creating the Wildlife and Natural Resource Trust and of the ongoing strong support by Wyoming voters and elected officials for this fund.

This year the Legislature has the unique opportunity to leverage for dimes on the dollar unused and unallocated federal funds to help protect some of Wyoming’s most important ranch land and to continue the stewardship that generations of ranchers have practiced.

The bonus is that with passage of this bill we, as a state, will prove in yet another way our commitment to protecting—without a federal threat to our primacy—the sage grouse.

The Wyoming Outdoor Council (working in coordination with a number of stakeholders and conservation partners) strongly supports this bill. We are actively engaged in lobbying for its passage.

Addressing aquatic invasive species

A third bill that we are encouraging legislators to vote for is Senate File 71, which seeks to address the threat that zebra mussels, an aquatic invasive species, pose to agriculture and tourism.

If we as a state fail to continue our successful fight against this and other aquatic invasive species the financial consequence could be profound.

We are asking legislators to resist any attempt to reduce funding for this bill and to vote in favor of protecting one of our most important resources—Wyoming’s water.

As always, the engagement of our members is crucial to our success. We will work to keep you informed and up to date.

If you have specific questions, please be in touch with me, either at my email address or my cell phone.

You can also follow me on Twitter @richardmgarrett, or the Wyoming Outdoor Council at @OutdoorCouncil.

Richard Garrett, energy and legislative advocate, richard@wyomingoutdoorcouncil.org, 307-438-9516

 

Other posts you might want to see:

In a short budget session, still some environment-related bills

Support the tax incentive for small renewable energy

Wyoming Looks to Craft a State Energy Policy: What to Consider

 

 

Another nail in the coffin for the Flaming Gorge pipeline?

By Steve Jones

THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TODAY REJECTED COLORADO entrepreneur Aaron Million’s latest application to build a water pipeline from Flaming Gorge reservoir and the Green River up over the Continental Divide, across Wyoming, and down into Front Range Colorado.

This decision to dismiss Mr. Million’s preliminary application is great news, from the Wyoming Outdoor Council’s perspective, and we think it is another nail in the coffin for the Million Pipeline.

We’ve argued from the start that this proposed trans-basin water diversion is simply a bad idea.FERC dismissal

In December, 2011, Wyoming Outdoor Council, along with many other conservation organizations, intervened in this latest attempt by Mr. Million’s company to build the proposed pipeline.

At first this pipeline proposal was put forward as strictly a trans-basin diversion of Green River water, and therefore went before the Army Corps of Engineers as the lead federal agency to perform the necessary permitting and environmental review. But as that relationship became strained, Mr. Million decided to pull his application with the Army Corps of Engineers, and change the nature of the proposal into a “power” project (involving 7 hydropower projects total–including two pumped storage projects) that, he believed, converted it into a proposal to be authorized under the Federal Power Act.

But today the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission rightly rejected that plan, saying that the agency would not consider granting even a preliminary license to this company (known as Wyco Power and Water Inc.) under the circumstances.

FERC ruled that since these power projects were totally dependent on the construction of this pipeline, and since none of the necessary authorizations for this pipeline, or its routing, have been obtained, it is entirely too “premature” to even consider the company’s preliminary permit application.

Mr. Million’s company appears to be running out of options.

Click here or on the image of the document to read the decision.

 

Contact: Steve Jones, Wyoming Outdoor Council watershed protection program attorney, 207-332-7031, steve@wyomingoutdoorcouncil.org

 

 

Other posts you might want to see:

Video: Proposed Flaming Gorge Pipeline

EPA’s Presentation to the Pavillion Community Nov. 2011

EPA’s November 2011 Report on Pavillion Water Contamination

Hydraulic fracturing: what we’d like to achieve

Colorado water official blasts entrepreneur’s pipeline proposal

In a short budget session, still some environment-related bills

By Richard Garrett, Jr.

Your voice for conservation at the Wyoming State Legislature

It’s Always a Mixed Bag at the Capitol

As I write this it’s 2 p.m., Friday, February 17 at the Wyoming State Capitol, which means the 61st session of the State Legislature has just about finished up its first week of the biennium budget session (which will include what many believe will be a spirited redistricting debate) in Cheyenne.

There are only three more weeks to go in this short session so both the House and Senate have been reluctant to approve for consideration too many bills that could distract legislators from their primary objectives—balancing the budget and preserving their legislative districts.

It’s against this backdrop that we’ve seen the rejection of some environmentally important bills, while at the same time others that have implications for our mission have survived introduction.

Puzzling that the nat gas powered vehicles bill was rejected

The House has just declined to support for further consideration House Bill 109 sponsored by Representative Jim Roscoe, which would have helped further the state’s evaluation of natural gas powered vehicles.

It’s a shame this bill was rejected since Wyoming operates more than 1,700 mostly diesel school buses, each of which achieves only about 7 miles per gallon in fuel economy.

With oil prices projected to continue to rise (and gasoline and diesel fuel with it)—and considering that those school buses cover a reported 76,000 route miles per day, and more than 12 million miles annually—it seems rather contrarian that the Wyoming Legislature is reluctant to explore a way to use an abundant, homegrown, and affordable fuel in its fleet.

What is even more puzzling is why this bill, which enjoyed strong support from the natural gas industry and Governor Matt Mead, could not muster the 2/3 votes necessary to move up the legislative ladder.

One Senate bill seeks an end-run around the judicial process

We’ve also seen the Legislature begin the process of trying to dismantle a victory that the Wyoming Outdoor Council won in district court last year regarding the way that the state’s Department of Environmental Quality issues water discharge permits for coalbed methane development.

The Outdoor Council’s watershed protection program attorney, Steve Jones, argued successfully that the DEQ’s one-size-fits-all approach to produced water permits in coalbed methane fields of the Powder River Basin was not only bad for the environment but also legally flawed.

The state is now scrambling to protect its approach to issuing general emissions permits across a broad range of activities including storm water management and pesticide spraying.

Senate File 85, if passed, will do an end-run around the judicial process and allow the state to issue general permits, applicable across the state, thus restricting the public’s ability to evaluate locally-specific impacts to the environment.

We’ve argued against this bill in committee and will continue to argue against it as it makes its way through the Legislature.

Tax credit for small renewables narrowly failed

Another bill that we (and a number of environmental organizations and renewable energy installation companies) supported, House Bill 79, narrowly failed introduction.

The bill would simply have extended a sales tax credit on the purchase of the equipment and materials needed for small-scale renewable installations, such as rooftop solar.

At $25,000 the fiscal impact to the state was insignificant while the benefits to individuals was significant. In a state where our leaders frequently argue that when it comes to energy we “need it all” their rejection of support for a fledgling industry seems shortsighted.

It’s worth noting, too, that this bill failed while a multimillion dollar tax reduction for the coal industry, House Bill 38, looks poised to have a much better fate (that is, if you’re a coal producer).

State could regulate greenhouse gases

All is not doom and gloom, though. We are supporting a bill, Senate File 86, that will enable the state to permit greenhouse gases in a way consistent with EPA regulations.

While this bill is limited and tentative, it represents the first time in memory that Wyoming legislators will link the two words (greenhouse and gas) together in any kind of environmentally responsible way.

Hybrid nuclear energy systems

Speaking of the “all of the above” approach to energy, the Wyoming Legislature is also considering any number of bills that are intended to fund further study of nuclear energy in the state.

One in particular, Senate File 14, will fund a state partnership with the Idaho National Laboratory for the evaluation of hybrid nuclear energy systems. The INL’s lead scientist on this project, Dr. Richard Boardman, is well credentialed and, as such, we expect him to be able to keep the state’s role in nuclear energy well focused and science based.

For now, that is all from Cheyenne. I’m lucky enough to be heading to Fort Collins, CO this weekend to watch the University of Wyoming versus Colorado State University men’s basketball game . . . Go Pokes!

P.S. If there are any bills about which you are particularly interested (and you can review them here) please let me know. (richard@wyomingoutdoorcouncil.org or 307-349-2423)

P.P.S. Next Friday, February 24, is our legislative reception at the Plains Hotel. Our board and staff will be there as will any number of legislators. We hope you can attend. See our website for more information.

 

Other posts you might want to see:

Support the tax incentive for small renewable energy

Wyoming Looks to Craft a State Energy Policy: What to Consider

 

 

Support the tax incentive for small renewable energy

By Richard Garrett, Jr.

Your voice for conservation at the Wyoming State Legislature

ARE YOU ON FACEBOOK OR TWITTER? Please pass this message along to your friends and followers.

Please help us support House Bill 79.

The Wyoming Outdoor Council is working with a broad coalition of organizations, trade groups, and contractors to generate support at the Wyoming legislature for the renewal of a sales tax exemption for small renewable energy systems.

As most of you know, the 2012 Wyoming legislative session (a biennium budget session) started this week and is already well under way.

We are asking you to help us get the word out about this bill.

You can read House Bill 79 at this link.

How you can help

Representative Esquibel from Cheyenne is sponsoring legislation to extend Wyoming’s sales tax exemption for small renewable energy systems—essentially rooftop solar and backyard wind.

Rep. Esquibel has worked to get a good group of co-sponsors including, Reps. Byrd, Gingery, Goggles, Illoway, Nicholas, Petroff, Roscoe, Vranish, and Dave Zwonitzer.

But he needs your help to get your representative to vote for the bill on introduction.

HB 79: Renewable Resources Electricity Generation Exemption could be up for an introductory vote as early as tomorrow, Thursday, February 16, in the State House so please take a moment to contact your Representative as soon as possible!

Here are some talking points that you can use in an email to your representative. But what is best is if you put things in your own words. If you have a small renewable energy system installed or have some connection to the renewable energy sector, your message is particularly important.

  • More than 150 homes and businesses throughout the state have connected a small renewable energy system to the electrical grid as a way to reduce their power demand and costs.
  • Given Wyoming’s abundant wind and sunshine, there is great opportunity for more Wyoming citizens, businesses, and local governments to install these small renewable energy systems.
  • In addition to benefits for customers, the installation and maintenance of small renewable energy systems are also job creators. An increasing number of people in Wyoming are directly and indirectly employed in companies that design and install home and business-based renewable energy systems.
  • This growing business sector presents a great opportunity for Wyoming to take advantage of our abundant renewable energy resources and create a win-win situation by adding jobs and economic development, allowing utilities to save costs of building new generation sources, and, most importantly, saving Wyomingites money on their electricity bills.
  • The legislature has the opportunity to foster the renewable energy businesses and their customers by supporting an extension to Wyoming’s state sales tax exemption for small grid-tied renewable energy systems.
  • The sales tax exemption is the ONLY incentive the state provides to encourage home and business-based renewable energy. It is sound policy, with many benefits and very little cost in terms of lost revenue.

Please ask your Representative to support House Bill 79 in the 2012 Budget Session and help this business sector grow and thrive!

You can find contact information for members of the Wyoming House of Representatives by clicking here.

If you need assistance identifying your representative, please don’t hesitate to ask me.

Thanks for your action!

Contact: Richard Garrett, Wyoming Outdoor Council legislative advocate, richard@wyomingoutdoorcouncil.org; 307-349-2423.

Spectacular Wyoming photos, winter 2011 — 2012

Check out these recent shots of beautiful Wyoming, taken by Wyoming Outdoor Council staff and board members.

 

Other posts you might want to see:

Winter Frontline 2011, the Wyoming Outdoor Council Newsletter

Photos: Ride the Red 2011

Adobe Town in Spring: Photographs

Photos from our Little Mountain field trip

Winners of the Wyoming Outdoor Council calendar photo contest